
I don't understand where this repeated need to trash evolution comes from. Michael Behe (who was quoted) has been discredited. Most of the books you cited have terrible reviews on Amazon.
I'd have to read up more to discredit your other arguments, but the one I can do off the top of my head is the "transitional species" one. It's like the Kirk Cameron/Crockoduck one. There are no transitional species because every creature links from one to the next. If you were to use photographs instead of fossils as proof of my development, I could show you a thousand photos of me as a kid, and a dozen of me as a 34 year old. But I could never show you a single one of me transitioning from that kid to the 34 year old.